Document Type
Article
Department
Institute for the Study of Muslim Civilisations, London
Abstract
Using Shahzad Bashir’s open-access publication A New Vision for Islamic Pasts and Futures as a baseline, this symposium debates whether and how intellectual history can be done otherwise. Mohamed ‘Arafa follows Bashir’s invitation to explore the potential of open-ended historiographies when he thinks about the viability of a flexible method to interpret Sharī͑a. Nader El-Bizri interrogates whether the assemblage of personal experiential accounts offered by Bashir can be framed within the discourse of intellectual history at all. Nauman Faizi reads Bashir’s approach as a radical attempt to open up hermeneutical possibilities. Lena Salaymeh suggests that modern aesthetics can contribute to neo-colonial distortions of the Islamic tradition, rather than offering alternatives to positivist historiography. Bashir proposes in his response that academics adopt generosity as an analytical gesture in their academic writing, a generosity that would enable different ways of being human in the world.
Publication (Name of Journal)
Journal of World Philosophies
DOI
10.2979/jourworlphil.7.2.06
Recommended Citation
Arafa, M.,
Bashir, S.,
El-Bizri, N.,
Faizi, N.,
Salaymeh, L. H.
(2022). Symposium: Can intellectual history be done otherwise?. Journal of World Philosophies, 7(2), 69-108.
Available at:
https://ecommons.aku.edu/uk_ismc_faculty_publications/314
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Comments
This work was published before Shahzad joined Aga Khan University.