Do Surgical Setbacks Shape Surgical Judgment? Exploring the Psychological and Cognitive Effects of Complications on Neurosurgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study from Pakistan

Document Type

Article

Department

Neurosurgery; Surgery

Abstract

Background: Neurosurgery carries one of the highest complication-associated morbidity burdens of any surgical specialty. While patient-facing consequences of adverse events are well documented, the psychological, professional, and financial impact on the operating neurosurgeon, the "second victim," remains poorly characterized, limiting the development of evidence-based support frameworks.
Objective: To examine the psychological and behavioral sequelae experienced by neurosurgeons following major surgical complications and to identify unmet institutional support needs.
Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was distributed to neurosurgeons across varied practice settings and career stages across Pakistan. Domains included complication exposure, emotional impact, confidence changes, decision-making modifications, morbidity and mortality conference participation, support received, financial consequences, medicolegal concern, and preferred support modalities. Descriptive statistics were applied.
Results: Eighty-one neurosurgeons participated. Major complications were reported by 96%; neurological deficit and postoperative infection were most common, 62% each. More than 63% rated emotional impact at 4 or 5 of 5, and 73% reported a postcomplication decline in surgical confidence. Fear or hesitation in managing similar cases affected 72%. 86% modified their decision-making through increased conservatism, defensive documentation, and greater second-opinion seeking yet 77.8% received no formal support. Financial consequences affected 27.2% and 75.3% perceived inadequate institutional financial protection.
Conclusions: Surgical complications impose a substantial multidimensional burden on neurosurgeons, encompassing emotional distress, confidence erosion, and financial strain. The near-universal absence of formal support represents a critical institutional gap. Structured peer support, reflective debriefing, and financial protection mechanisms should be systematically integrated into neurosurgical practice.

Comments

 Issue no. was not provided by author/publisher

Publication (Name of Journal)

World neurosurgery

DOI

10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125182

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS