Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Document Type
Article
Department
Medicine
Abstract
Pressure-wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses but remains underutilized owing to procedural complexity, cost, and the need for hyperemic agents. Angiography-derived physiology (ADP) platforms offer a wire-free, adenosine-free alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of ADP-guided versus FFR-guided revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease.
Publication (Name of Journal)
JRSM cardiovascular disease
DOI
10.1177/20480040261469414
Recommended Citation
Shah, M. M.,
Fatima, S.,
Khachatryan, M.,
Angela, I. C.,
Arshad, U.,
Khawar, M. M.,
Jacques, J. S.,
Agha, N.,
Hashmi, H.,
Malombe, B. A.,
Ayaz, Z.,
Khawar, M.
(2026). Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JRSM cardiovascular disease, 15(-), 1-13.
Available at:
https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_med/798
Comments
Issue no. was not provided by author/publisher.