Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Document Type

Article

Department

Medicine

Abstract

Pressure-wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses but remains underutilized owing to procedural complexity, cost, and the need for hyperemic agents. Angiography-derived physiology (ADP) platforms offer a wire-free, adenosine-free alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of ADP-guided versus FFR-guided revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease.

Comments

Issue no. was not provided by author/publisher.

Publication (Name of Journal)

JRSM cardiovascular disease

DOI

10.1177/20480040261469414

Share

COinS