Single versus second observer vs artificial intelligence to increase the ADENOMA detection rate of colonoscopy-A network analysis
Document Type
Article
Department
Internal Medicine
Abstract
Background and aims: Screening colonoscopy has significantly contributed to the reduction of the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its associated mortality, with adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the quality marker. To increase the ADR, various solutions have been proposed including the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and employing second observers during colonoscopies. In the interest of AI improving ADR independently, without a second observer, and the operational similarity between AI and second observer, this network meta-analysis aims at evaluating the effectiveness of AI, second observer, and a single observer in improving ADR.
Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science Core Collection, Korean Citation Index, SciELO, Global Index Medicus, and Cochrane. A direct head-to-head comparator analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using the random-effects model. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: We analyzed 26 studies, involving 22,560 subjects. In the direct comparative analysis, AI demonstrated higher ADR (OR: 0.668, 95% CI 0.595-0.749, p < 0.001) than single observer. Dual observer demonstrated a higher ADR (OR: 0.771, 95% CI 0.688-0.865, p < 0.001) than single operator. In network meta-analysis, results were consistent on the network meta-analysis, maintaining consistency. No statistical difference was noted when comparing AI to second observer. (RR 1.1 (0.9-1.2, p = 0.3). Results were consistent when evaluating only RCTs. Net ranking provided higher score to AI followed by second observer followed by single observer.
Conclusion: Artificial Intelligence and second-observer colonoscopy showed superior success in Adenoma Detection Rate when compared to single-observer colonoscopy. Although not statistically significant, net ranking model favors the superiority of AI to the second observer.
Publication (Name of Journal)
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Recommended Citation
Gangwani, M. K.,
Haghbin, H.,
Ishtiaq, R.,
Hasan, F.,
Dillard, J.,
Jabbar, F.,
Dahiya, D. S.,
Ali, H.,
Salim, S.,
-Smith, W. L.
(2024). Single versus second observer vs artificial intelligence to increase the ADENOMA detection rate of colonoscopy-A network analysis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 69(4), 1380-1388.
Available at:
https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_intern_med/254