Historical influences on utilising upright positions for birth in Africa
Document Type
Article
Department
School of Nursing and Midwifery, East Africa
Abstract
Birthing positions in the second stage of labour have been researched widely in the last three decades. Upright positions in this paper refer to positions attained while the spine is vertical (Sutton 2000) and other alternative positions which may facilitate normality in birth; kneeling, standing, squatting, sitting with the back at an upright angleof more than 45 degrees, all fours and lateral positions (De Jonge & Langro-Janssen 2004). Recent evidence suggests that upright positions are associated with fewer episiotomies, less pain, reduced instrumental deliveries and shorter duration of second stage of labour (De Jonge et al 2004, Walsh 2011, Gupta et al 2012, Nieuwenhauijze et al 2012). Moreover, there has been evidence of better neonatal outcomes and increased maternal satisfaction when compared to supine positions. Current recommendations from the UK’s National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) (2014) endorse the practice of women utilizing alternative positions in labour and discourages use of spine positions in normal childbirth.
Publication (Name of Journal)
Midirs Midwifery Digest
Recommended Citation
Atsali, E.,
Edwards, G.
(2017). Historical influences on utilising upright positions for birth in Africa. Midirs Midwifery Digest, 27(1), 119-123.
Available at:
https://ecommons.aku.edu/eastafrica_fhs_sonam/147