Open-label, dose-escalation FIGHT-101 study of pemigatinib combined with targeted therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies

Mansoor Saleh, Aga Khan University
Minal Barve, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, United States
Vivek Subbiah, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, United States
Kyriakos Papadopoulos, START San Antonio, United States
Daniel Morgensztern, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
Niharika Mettu, Duke University Medical Center, United States
Sameek Roychowdhury,, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States
Iben Spanggaard, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
Incyte International Biosciences Sàrl, Switzerland
Chenwei Tian, Incyte Corporation, United States

Abstract

Background: Pemigatinib is an oral, potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor. FIGHT-101, a three-part, open-label, first-in-human, phase I/II study (NCT02393248), evaluated pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parts 1 and 2, pemigatinib monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in FGFR-altered tumors. Part 3 (pemigatinib combination therapies) results are presented here.

Patients and methods: Patients received 9, 13.5, or 20 mg oral once-daily pemigatinib on continuous or intermittent schedules with gemcitabine and cisplatin (pemi/gem/cis), docetaxel (pemi/doc), trastuzumab (pemi/tras), pembrolizumab (pemi/pembro), or retifanlimab (pemi/reti) irrespective of whether the tumor was confirmed as FGFR altered. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints were investigatorassessed tumor objective response rates (ORRs) and pharmacokinetics (PK).

Results: Of 65 enrolled patients (pemi/gem/cis, n ¼ 8; pemi/doc, n ¼ 7; pemi/tras, n ¼ 6; pemi/pembro, n ¼ 26; pemi/reti, n ¼ 18), all discontinued. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally consistent with individual drug AEs. Serious and grade 3 TEAEs occurred in 0%-85.7% and 33.3%-100.0% of patients across treatment groups, respectively. All pemigatinib combinations demonstrated steady-state PK comparable to monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic effects in all pemigatinib combinations, except pemi/gem/cis, were consistent with monotherapy. Less inhibition of FGFR2a phosphorylation was observed with this combination. ORRs (95% confidence interval) were 37.5% [8.5% to 75.5% (pemi/gem/cis)], 14.3% [0.4% to 57.9% (pemi/doc)], 0% (pemi/tras), 26.9% [11.6% to 47.8% (pemi/pembro)], and 11.1% [1.4% to 34.7% (pemi/reti)]. All groups had instances of tumor shrinkage. ORRs in assessable patients with FGFR rearrangements and mutations were 50% and 33%, respectively.

Conclusions: Pemigatinib combination therapy showed no unexpected toxicities. PK and pharmacodynamics were mostly consistent with pemigatinib monotherapy. Pemi/gem/cis (37.5%) and pemi/pembro (26.9%) had the highest ORR; most responders had FGFR alterations.