Authors

Karen Klein, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Elizabeth M. McClure, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniela Colaci, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Vanessa Thorsten, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Patricia L. Hibberd, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Fabian Esamai, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya
Ana Garces, Fundación para la Alimentación y Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá, Guatemala City, Guatemala
Archana Patel, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India
Sarah Saleem, Aga Khan UniversityFollow
Omrana Pasha, Aga Khan UniversityFollow
Elwyn Chomba, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
Waldemar A. Carlo, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nancy F. Krebs, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Shivaprasad Goudar, KLE University's Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
Richard J. Derman, Christiana Health Care, Newark, DE, USA.
Edward A. Liechty, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marion Koso-Thomas, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pierre M. Buekens, Tulane School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
José M. Belizán, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Robert L. Goldenberg, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Fernando Althabe, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina

Document Type

Article

Department

Community Health Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Antenatal Corticosteroid Trial (ACT) assessed the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of a multifaceted intervention to increase the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in mothers at risk of preterm birth at all levels of care in low and middle-income countries. The intervention effectively increased the use of ACS but had no overall impact on neonatal mortality in the targeted <5(th) percentile birth weight infants. Being in the intervention clusters was also associated with an overall increase in neonatal deaths. We sought to explore plausible pathways through which this intervention increased neonatal mortality.

METHODS:

We conducted secondary analyses to assess site differences in outcome and potential explanations for the differences in outcomes if found. By site, and in the intervention and control clusters, we evaluated characteristics of the mothers and care systems, the proportion of the <5(th) percentile infants and the overall population that received ACS, the rates of possible severe bacterial infection (pSBI), determined from clinical signs, and neonatal mortality rates.

RESULTS:

There were substantial differences between the sites in both participant and health system characteristics, with Guatemala and Argentina generally having the highest levels of care. In some sites there were substantial differences in the health system characteristics between the intervention and control clusters. The increase in ACS in the intervention clusters was similar among the sites. While overall, there was no difference in neonatal mortality among <5(th) percentile births between the intervention and control clusters, Guatemala and Pakistan both had significant reductions in neonatal mortality in the <5(th) percentile infants in the intervention clusters. The improvement in neonatal mortality in the Guatemalan site in the <5(th) percentile infants was associated with a higher level of care at the site and an improvement in care in the intervention clusters. There was a significant increase overall in neonatal mortality in the intervention clusters compared to the control. Across sites, this increase in neonatal mortality was statistically significant and most apparent in the African sites. This increase in neonatal mortality was accompanied by a significant increase in pSBI in the African sites.

CONCLUSIONS:

The improvement in neonatal mortality in the Guatemalan site in the <5(th) percentile infants was associated with a higher level of care and an improvement in care in the intervention clusters. The increase in neonatal mortality in the intervention clusters across all sites was largely driven by the poorer outcomes in the African sites, which also had an increase in pSBI in the intervention clusters. We emphasize that these results come from secondary analyses. Additional prospective studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of ACS on neonatal health in low resource settings.

Publication

Reproductive Health

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS